Demon Lord 3

I've always heard about how ordinary people should live. Many people say we should live well, that we should let our children surpass us, and that we should let our parents live better than the previous generation. Actually, this question wasn't directed primarily to me, but to the author I met a while ago. To be frank, that person wasn't really an author, but a medical student who later developed a hobby of writing and became an amateur master. I'd always been aware of this question, and I wanted to become a great author myself. If she could become an author as a medical student, then could I, a cultivator, do the same? But when I truly understood writing, I found it incredibly difficult. It wasn't about telling people those little stories, but about truly experiencing and understanding life, and sharing positive energy. If I kept conveying negativity, pessimism, and unrelated stories, would people want to hear it? The result is definitely not. Who would listen to something that has nothing to do with reality, nothing to do with oneself, nothing to do with the so-called bottom of the world? I often use the word "so-called," and what it really means is that there is no such thing as the bottom of the world. Ordinary people can live well, just being ordinary doesn't mean being at the bottom. There is no distinction between high and low in the world. Ordinary only represents the masses, not that someone has accomplished nothing. Doing what the masses do, doing things that others can't accomplish, doing things that one considers impressive, is already remarkable, not that one is incompetent. Is cleaning up simple? If that's what the average person does, then there are many chaebols who simply can't do it. To put it bluntly, it's these people who toil at the bottom, then create wealth, which is then accumulated by many others, making them wealthy. Sometimes, what these people create with their own hands is no less than what those who sit back and wait to collect the money do. In fact, they create a lot more. Why do so many people ask the author this question? She also told me that the hero in the first and second parts is the same person, but the way they are written is completely different. In the first part, he is a completely ordinary person who doesn’t even have money to treat his illness. He wants to give up treatment and believes that the domestic technology is not enough to cure the disease. It is a rare case, but it is indeed a genetic disease. He wants to leave something for his children, but he can’t leave anything. Curing his own disease is a big deal. The hero of the second part is also reborn and is directly at the peak of his life, but he is targeted and later framed in a foreign country. Although he has done well, he has never dared to return to his original city. Even if he remembers something, he dare not say it directly for fear of causing fatal disaster. Of course, everything that follows is said in the tone of another person, not the original one. Author, I understand that no matter who it is, the general subject matter of this article has changed a lot, especially the story in the beginning about a low-level person who used his life to exchange for money, and then the story of getting seriously ill and using the remaining money to prolong his life. Although the second part has gone through many twists and turns, he unexpectedly went to a good place, made a lot of money, became the big boss he had always dreamed of in his life, and had his own wife and his wife's previous children. Although they are not biological children, they are also good to him. He does not remember his ex-girlfriend, nor does he have any news about his ex-wife and biological daughter. I don't know whether this idea and practice is right or wrong. In fact, if you say it from a person's perspective, this may be considered ungrateful, but to put it bluntly, he doesn't know about this matter, and he doesn't know what he had experienced before. If he knew everything when he came back that year, why didn't he look for his wife and children? Actually, when I read the first part, I was deeply moved. Even if he died in the end, I wouldn't have too many regrets. This person had completed the task that had been unfinished for so many years. All the things he had always wanted were now returned, and all the things he had hoped for were fulfilled. There was no regret. Think about it carefully, how many people have terminal illnesses and were unable to fulfill their final wishes before death? Don't those people have regrets? Don't they have regrets? Halfway through, many people were talking about this, especially thinking about their own lives and how they had gotten through those years.