【Historical Live Broadcast】Watching videos and being seen by our ancestors

[The school organized a war film viewing and asked everyone to write a review]

[Others write about anti-war ideas, cherishing peace and staying away from violence]

[My nephew, on the other hand, wrote an impassioned 3,000-word article on the positive effects of war, saying that troubled times bring people together, eliminate backward forces, and redistribute resources. He also said that war itself is the product of conflicts that are so intense that they cannot be adjusted, and is the result of a disaster rather than its cause.]

[The head teacher was shocked after reading it. There was such an anti-human element in the class. He called him to the office and did some ideological work on him. He even wanted to find a psychologist to help.]

"War can eliminate backwardness. Anyone who has seen the Yuan Dynasty will understand this. War cannot do that.

War is about rallying people's hearts. If you have seen peasant uprisings time and again, you will know that without ideas, people are just seeking death.

But in junior high school, he was able to look at things from a different perspective, which is amazing. He was not influenced by the public and remained true to himself, which is very strong. "

"There is nothing wrong with that statement. War is the product of conflicts that are so intense that they cannot be reconciled. It is the result, not the cause.

War is politics without bloodshed, and politics is war without bloodshed.

To unite people, just look at the national anthems of various countries.

The American national anthem was created during the Second Revolutionary War to resist the British.

The French national anthem, La Marseillaise, was written during the French Revolution to resist foreign interference.

There is no need to mention our national anthem.”

"A bit of a leftist ideology? What are the disadvantages? The environment, the people's hearts, and the consumption of the economy. Moreover, he puts himself in the perspective of the people in power. If he is the first civilian to be crippled and his parents died after the war, and he still insists on his ideas in his heart, then he is indeed a ruthless person. Otherwise, wouldn't he be a boastful hypocrite?

Some of what they said is true. War is indeed the product of intensified conflicts that cannot be resolved. Humanity cannot be at peace forever.”

"Sometimes a politician doesn't just choose not to fight a war because he doesn't want to. Provoking a war and being forced into a war are two different things."

“War is indeed the result of irreconcilable conflicts over survival resources.

War does create hatred and thus unite people.

But war is by no means positive and beneficial. Those who think war is cool and necessary are just social beings, where everyone above you is equal and those below you are clearly divided into different classes.

"If it is a foreign war, at worst the sin will be immediate but the benefit will be long-lasting. Territory, status, development and peace are all fought for, not begged for. The Korean War, the Self-Defense Counterattack against Vietnam, the Self-Defense Counterattack against India, the local war against the Soviet Union, the 16-year friction in the South China Sea. Without these, what would be the reform and opening up, what would be the development of economic construction. The correct attitude is to dare to fight, be good at fighting, and not talk about war lightly. Only when the initiative of peace is in our own hands can there be true peace."

We definitely can’t go to war. So many people will die in a war. My eldest and second child were dragged off to fight on the battlefield by those soldiers. Now there is no male left in my family!

How can ordinary people like us endure wars every day? In troubled times, human life is the least valuable thing!

A few days ago, those people fought with the adults in our city. Fortunately, we won, otherwise they would have massacred the whole city! Massacred the whole city! Then none of us would have survived!

This question was not only pondered by the common people in ancient times, but also by ancient philosophers.

Those who do not support the war responded: The child above has basically no problem with his understanding of war, but the phrase "eliminating backward forces" is problematic. Since ancient times, only the suffering masses can win when they unite. The benefits of launching a war belong to the upper class, and the people are the ones who suffer.

The clear-sighted politicians of the upper class: There are two sides to this world, yin and yang, how can we talk about right and wrong? Who is right and who is wrong? Everyone has a different way of thinking.

It is because of the competition between heroes and heroes in history that one's own strategy appears to be superior.

If you choose your camp well, victory will naturally lead to further advancement, and your descendants will enjoy wealth and prosperity for generations to come.