I make games to scare players from crying

[The difficulty of the game is moderate, and it didn't make me feel too desperate.Monsters have ways to deal with it, it's just up to you to find out. 】

"Like I said, this is a masterpiece that I will never forget! [-] points for it is not too much!"

Ah this...

Players don't get it.

Who the hell is telling the truth?

Why does the disadvantage mentioned by CA become an advantage when it comes to JM?

Especially the monster AI.

The former is said to be a headache, while the latter is said to be so smart that it is unimaginable.

So what does that mean?

What kind of monster is it?

Players don't know, but to be honest, players have different opinions on the shortcomings mentioned by CA.

It was originally a horror game, focusing on the fear of the unknown, the depression of the atmosphere, and the rendering of the environment.

You have the whole gun, and you make the gun so awesome, is that still called a horror game?

Therefore, it is only natural that the power of firearms becomes weaker.

Also, how did the random events that people like to talk about in "Mountain of the Sky" become "tiring" things in CA?

Could it be that the random events of Containment Breach are not as interesting and rich as Sky Mountain?

Not to mention stealth, many players rely on stealth to hide ghosts and monsters in horror games.

Without stealth, it means that life is not guaranteed!

As for getting lost...

It can only be said that the beholder sees benevolence!

Therefore, under these two highly polarized ratings, players continued to look down at the ratings of other players.

PO: 9.8 points

Comments: The game gives the common saving/loading settings a "justifiable" meaning, which adds a lot of sense of substitution when playing.

KL: 9.6 points

Comments: Very interesting random events, people will not get bored, the setting of monsters also reflects the developer's ideas and creativity, the plot is very good.

UC: 9.4 points

GA: 9.2 points

Idiot: The score is not out yet.

……

understood.Players finally understand.

Amid the applause from the media, only CA Maverick gave a low score.

Then the meaning is already obvious.

For two reasons.

1. The money is not in place.

2. The reviewer is an "intern" again.

It's just like using "temporary workers" to cover up the crime after something happened in China, it's just an excuse.

But CA, as an "authoritative" and "professional" media evaluation organization, is it so "obvious" shameless?

Shouldn't the score be changed again in a few days because "the money is in place"?

The players couldn't guess, so they went to the extranet to find the CA reviewers who reviewed "Containment Breach".

Then it was discovered that he had been denounced and complained by overseas players on the Internet.

After a detailed understanding, it was discovered that this time the CA reviewer.

Is a person who mainly plays FPS cool games.

He gave "Battlefield Smoke" a high score of 9.5 or more for an annual FPS fast food game...

The players suddenly realized.

This is an irresponsible review!

So, they followed the overseas players to denounce this CA reviewer who scored indiscriminately under the Youtube review video!

Add PVP mode after Chapter 123?

At this time, the CA evaluation video was full of excitement.

A large number of overseas netizens rushed to comment.

User A from America 3 minutes ago:

"Imagine someone not playing this masterpiece because of this video. I have to admit, CA is stupid in some ways."

User B from Japan 3 minutes ago:

"It's this guy who gives "Smoke of the Battlefield" high marks every time. I thought it would be fun, but he just thinks it's fun!"

User C from America 3 minutes ago:

"I love that people are outraged by this review, and rightly so. Because this reviewer is doing exactly what he likes!"

User D from Smecta 4 minutes ago:

"I think CA is doing the right thing. Huaguo's games are of poor quality. They are trying to go international to earn money from the world. Obviously, CA will not do what they want. I support CA!"

E user from Russia 5 minutes ago:

"The monster's AI is a headache? I think that's right. After all, the game's AI is probably smarter than CA's employees, which of course is going to be a headache for him."

User F from England 5 minutes ago:

"The review should be more professional, but I can't see how professional it is from the video and content. On the contrary, I see prejudice, arrogance, and self-esteem. This is a very irresponsible performance !"

G user from Huaguo 6 minutes ago:

"I'm dying of laughter, the player comments under the CA video are the real reviews, hahaha."

At this time, YouTube's evaluation video is full of such accusations.

Even though the game hasn't been released yet, people haven't played it yet.

But comparing the evaluations of other media, you can know that CA is simply making random evaluations!

You haven't watched the game video before, and you don't know what the so-called monster AI is like.

Now after watching the original evaluation video of CA, I realize that the so-called "monster AI is a headache" actually refers to being too intelligent.

So much so that the rookie reviewer CA died repeatedly in the game.

It can be seen from the editing method of the video that he died many times when evaluating the experience!

It is understandable if the difficulty of AI is unreasonable.

But why didn't JM and other media say that?

Then the problem is obvious, this CA reviewer is too bad!

Players believe that this kind of irresponsible behavior of scoring based on preference is probably a warning.

Meaning: Want a high score?pay!

But whether that's the case or not, the review video has sparked outrage.

As a result, many overseas players have gone to T Special to scold the CA headquarters.

This nature is different.

It's okay to scold under the evaluation video, but it's a big deal for CA not to watch it.

But T Special is the largest communication platform overseas!

Its number of users is more than domestic V blogs!

Cursing on this, it is being watched by countless pairs of eyes!

So, the next morning.

The reviewer didn't know if he couldn't bear the humiliation, but he actually published a tweet on his private account.

In brief overview, it is:

I have cleared this game, and I have enough right to speak.

I think this game is just as I reviewed it, hard to play, tiring.

Everyone has a different gaming experience, this is my personal experience.

Those of you who have never played games are not even qualified to speak, so why blame me?

I'm not going to revise the rating, it's just how I feel directly.

I'm just telling everyone how I feel, and there's nothing wrong with that!

If you like this game, then you go buy it.

If my review affects you, please understand that the review is only for reference, not absolute.

If you read the reviews and choose not to buy, that's your problem too, no wonder me!

That's it, I still have to work, please don't disturb me.

……

As soon as this tweet came out, the player circle was like a powder keg being ignited, affecting countless people.

Many people have responded below it.

But almost all accused him of being irresponsible and careless.

It is obviously not your own audience game, why do you want to evaluate and influence others?

Now that he has put aside the relationship and sold himself miserably, what kind of drama should he act in?

So soon, in just half a day, the number of replies to the tweet reached more than 2000.

And the reviewer seemed to have disappeared and never appeared again.

No matter how unbearable the comments below are, they never show up.

Seeing this, overseas players and some Chinese players immediately shifted their positions.

Once again came to CA's T special account and began to accuse.

Since the incident was relatively serious, another day passed.

CA issued a statement on the matter, saying that the reviewer participated in the main work without training, which was the dereliction of duty and negligence of their management.

And when the reviewer is working, he has strong personal subjective opinions and interest bias, and improper handling after the event.

The employee has been suspended and retrained.Only when you have real experience and ability can you carry out the evaluation work.

CA then deleted the review video for Containment Breach.

It is said that the experience score will be changed again, and please give your support at that time!

Although this statement did not clearly impose a considerable penalty on the reviewer, it should have been done.

This matter can be regarded as over.

However, Meng Shu noticed the unfair behavior of the players.

He, who never showed up, issued a notice after the incident.

Said: In order to thank the players for their love and support, the production team decided to develop an online multiplayer PVP mode on the basis of the game "Containment Breach".

Different from the single-player mode, multiplayer will have a new game mechanism, and can support up to 20 players online at the same time.

At that time, it will be updated to the game as a free DLC, allowing players to play two games for the same price!In order to repay the players for their long-term support.