Werewolf: Please start your show

Chapter 609: A person who does not act the same as he says may not be a wolf

Chapter 609: A person who says one thing and does another may not be a wolf
[The Sheriff's election PK speech is over, all players please start voting]

The system's beep sounded in everyone's ears.

At this time, the good guys must try their best to get the right votes, because the wolves are likely to vote for them. Once the good guys stand on the wrong side, the result can be imagined, and the police badge will definitely be lost.

This board is not guarded, and if the prophet does not have a police badge, it is equivalent to missing a day of checking people. Many times, the outcome of the game depends on the day's checking or rounds.

There is not much time, and the voting results are out.

2、3、5、6、9、12选择上票给7号玩家。

4、8、10、11选择上票给1号玩家。

Six votes to four.

Player No. 7 still got the police badge with a two-vote advantage.

However, judging from the ticket type, the wind direction has changed.

Before the PK speech, almost no one wanted to stand on the side of player 1, but after listening to the PK speech, 1 actually had four votes.

This shows that some people are dissatisfied with player No. 7’s PK speech.

Of course.

It is also possible that the Wolves rushed the ticket.

But it definitely doesn't mean that all the wolves will charge forward. There must be a hook wolf on the field. If there is no hook, based on the words of Player 1, if all the wolves charge forward, they will have almost no chance of winning.

Either there is a barb, or there is a deep-water wolf who has made a good speech, or player No. 2 is the wolf, and wolves 1 and 2 step on the wolf to gain their identity.

要说1、4、8、10、11五个人中有四头狼,顾风不信。

[Player No. 7 was elected Sheriff, Christmas Eve last night]

The system's beep sounded in everyone's ears.

[Please choose the order of speeches for this round]

[Player No. 6 please speak]

"Tsk tsk, I don't know if I'm lucky or unlucky. I was the first one to speak among all the police officers. I suddenly remembered a phrase, 'throwing a brick to attract jade.'"

"In that case, let me talk about my ideas."

"First of all, let me tell you which side I am on. You should all be able to guess which side I am on. My vote type is which side I am on."

"Actually, the two prophets 1 and 7 have some bad things to say."

"It's true that I'm the No. 7 player on the sidelines, but his speech is also problematic."

"The most obvious thing is in his attitude towards player number 8. He said that he didn't learn the set position, but in fact he learned the point 8 from the set position to enter the wolf pit."

“Although when PK spoke, he had already explained to us the purpose and benefits of doing this.”

"How should I put it? I suggest that Player 7 should not play so many tricks in the future. It is really easy to fail because some good people do not agree with your logic, and may not even understand it and cannot get around it."

"To be honest, if it weren't for the fact that Player 1 had a big problem with his badge flow and perspective, and if Player 2 had a good surface, this badge would probably have fallen into Player 1's hands."

Although player 6 is on the side of player 7, he really thinks that player 7 is playing with fire, so he talks to player 7 and tells him to stop playing such fancy tricks.

If you play well, it's fine. But if you play badly, all the good people will suffer, and their ancestors may be cursed for nineteen generations.

Prophet, it is better to be steady and not mess around, otherwise you will be helping the wolves.

But then again, according to Player 7's thinking, Players 3 and 5 who voted for him in the first round could indeed recognize it. If they were wolves, they could just vote for the wolf teammates directly without having to play the hook at all.

From this point, we can see that players 3, 5 and 1 do not share the same side, and both of them should be good people.

As for players 8 and 11, we have to listen to what they say. They may be good people on the wrong side, or they may be wolves.

We absolutely cannot kill them all with one blow just because they are on the bandit ticket. After all, when the police came, even Gu Feng, a Jinshui, did not directly stand on the side of 7.

“从票型来看,1、4、8、10、11五个人当中应该是要出四狼的,但也不排除外置位还有倒钩狼。”

"On the first day, let's sort out the logic, don't look for back-stabbing, don't over-complicate things, just look for wolves among those who voted for the bandits. When all the people who voted for the bandits have been cleared out, then we can talk about the issue of back-stabbing."

"But to be honest, I was quite surprised that Player 4 voted for Player 1. He was on the side of Player 7 and thought Player 2 looked like a good person."

"Why did he vote for the police badge for 1 in the end? I can't figure out what made him change his mind so drastically. I can even say that he was hooking and hooking, why did he rush forward?"

"Player 4, do you think that Player 1 was better than Player 7 in the PK speech, especially when it came to the problem with Player 8, because Player 7's explanation was outrageous. You felt that the opportunity had come and you could lead the pace and charge, so you voted for your wolf teammates?"

"If that's the case, I can only say that you just couldn't hold back and didn't have enough willpower. If you want to hook, you'll hook to the end. If you rush for the ticket, you'll sell yourself out, understand?"

Player 6 turned his attention to player 4.

Among so many people who made it to the bandit vote, only 4 surprised him.

A police officer swore that he was on the side of player No. 7's card, but he actually went to vote for player No. 1. Isn't this inconsistent in words and deeds?
Generally speaking, most of the people whose words and deeds are inconsistent are wolves.

As for 8, 10, and 11, it was expected that the three of them would get the bandit votes. After all, they were all labeled as wolves by player No. 7. It would be strange if this vote could be cast for No. 7.

"I just talked about the shortcomings of player 7's speech. Now I will talk about the problems in player 1's speech."

"If I remember correctly, the wolf pits he selected are 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 12. According to his wolf pits, when 7 jumps out, the police queen may have to use three or even four wolves. In this case, 7 can still throw gold water to 9. What is he thinking?"

"The most interesting thing is that Player 1 clearly said that he couldn't put down the 9, and insisted on going to check the 9. But when he clicked on the wolf pit, there was no 9. Doesn't this wolf pit contradict the police badge style he played?"

"Personally, I think it's pretty amazing that player 1 can get into the wolf pit with both 9 and 12 at the same time. His perspective is wrong here, which makes me not want to stand with him."

“1、4、11应该是三头狼,然后8、10中再开一狼,所以我建议7号玩家今晚就在8、10中选验。”

"If neither of them is a wolf, then the one most likely to do the hook is 12. He started the hook from the police. In order to cooperate with him, player 1 deliberately played 12 to give him an identity."

6号玩家对12的身份是有质疑的,他觉得1、12有可能是双狼,12在打倒钩。

不过12的轮次,总归是在8、10后面,只有把8、10都排干净,才能考虑盘12是钩子。

As for candidates 3 and 5 below the police, the possibility of them both turning against each other is very small, because in the first round of voting for sheriff, only candidates below the police can vote, and candidate 8 will definitely vote for candidate 1.

In this case, the wolf will definitely rush to get the police badge. After all, this board has no guards, and the police badge represents the day's inspection, and the prophet must not be allowed to get it.

Therefore, if there are wolves among 3 and 5, it is unlikely that they will vote for 7, let alone vote for 7 for two consecutive rounds.

Their ticket type is enough to show that they don’t meet with Player 1.

"That's all I can say, officer. Fortunately, you all recognized me. I'm very happy. Judging from the current situation, you can't hit me no matter how hard you hit me, and this is enough."

"If nothing unexpected happens today, my ticket will definitely go to Player 1."

"Let's have one last conversation with the demon hunter. If you are not 90%, no, not more than 99%, sure, it is best not to poke him. Sometimes it is better to be still than to move. If you poke the wrong person, you will be helping the wolf to chase the wheel."

What Player No. 6 said is correct. When the good guys are leading in a round, the demon hunter is better off not poking anyone unless he is extremely sure that he will not poke the wrong person. Otherwise, he will be helping the wolves.

The demon hunter killed himself, and then he killed another god with his wolf knife at night. This was equivalent to two gods being killed in one night, and the good guys were almost bleeding profusely.

Many times, good situations are ruined in this way.

Werewolves don't need to look for opportunities themselves, demon hunters will drop points on their own.

In other words, if the good guys are ahead in a round, as long as the Demon Hunter can keep steady and not try to show off his skills, the Wolves will have little chance of winning.

So the question is, under what circumstances does the demon hunter need to use his skills to turn the tide?
Naturally, when the good guys are seriously behind in turns, the demon hunter secretly uses his skills to poke the wolves and catch up.

But this places very high demands on the demon hunter. During the day he must hide his identity and not be discovered by wolves or be bullied by good guys. At night he must also make sure he hunts the right wolves every time. If he makes a mistake even once, he will be dead.

If this is the case, the witcher will be under a lot of pressure, but the current situation is obviously in favor of the good guys, so the witcher just needs to stay put.

[Player No. 5 please speak]

"There's no need to say more about who I stand for. I'm definitely on the side of player No. 7. After all, I've voted for him for two consecutive rounds."

"As for the reasons and logic for voting for him, it's not complicated. There are only two reasons."

"First of all, player No. 7 dared to throw gold water to the police queen No. 9, and after listening to No. 9's speech, I felt that he was a good person. No. 7 and No. 9 don't meet, and No. 7's gold water is powerful."

"Secondly, 7 dared to point out player 8 under the police. I don't think this behavior is a tough move. He wants the police badge, and 8's vote is very important. In this case, why push 8 to the prophet team? It doesn't make sense." "Some people may think that 7 and 8 are twin wolves, and player 7 deliberately creates an opposite identity with 8, but I think this possibility is very small."

"So, I think 7 should be the prophet. It won't be wrong to stand on his side and not say anything, but it is definitely the wisest choice for the good guy who closes his eyes."

"Looking back at player 1, there is a problem with the badge flow, which shows that there is a problem with his perspective. Player 2's surface water is very good, and he doesn't look like a wolf to me."

"In this case, I will naturally side with Player 7 and vote for him."

Player No. 5 stood up and started talking about why he voted for 7 for two consecutive rounds. There was nothing wrong with his logic.

It can also be heard from his speech that 5 is quite confident about his side, otherwise, he would not be so confident.

From the perspective of player 5, no matter from which angle you look at the game, the prophet side of 7 is far greater than 1.

However, there are big problems with the police badge flow at 1 and the wolf pit that is pointed out. He definitely cannot stand on the side.

"There are quite a lot of people on guard in this round. Including me, there are four of us. I think player 3 is a good guy. There must be at least one wolf among players 8 and 11, or even two wolves."

"Relatively speaking, 8 is less of a bandit than 11. Maybe he was forced to be on the bandit vote because of the comments made by player 7. I think we can give him a little more tolerance."

"But there's nothing much to say about player No. 11. Unless his identity can be revealed, he should just stay in the wolf pit."

"Player No. 8, everyone can understand why you voted for No. 1 in the first round. But No. 7 tried to trick you into falling into a wolf's den, so it's understandable that you didn't vote for him."

"But when PK spoke, player No. 7 spent a lot of time explaining to you why he called you into the wolf pit, and even apologized to you. In the end, you still got the gang ticket. This is your biggest gangster face."

Although numbers 8 and 11 have been on the bandit ticket for consecutive times, with player No. 5, 8 still has some good face, although it is not big, but 11 definitely does not.

To put it bluntly, even if 1 is a prophet, 11 must be a traitor, because after listening to the speeches of 1 and 7, a good person will definitely stand on the side of 7. How could he stand on the side of 1?

Unless the trump card is a wolf, a purposeful charge or a barb, it is unlikely that the good guys will be on the wrong side.

"The bad side of player 10 is that he warned the 7th and 9th players of the upper plate against the double wolf, which is obviously wrong."

"If 7 and 9 are two wolves, how could player 9 not even dare to stand on the side after receiving the gold water from his teammate?"

"I think 9 is afraid to stand on the wrong side because he is afraid that 7 will be a wolf and throw gold water to him to win his favor and drag him into the water. He is even more afraid that the prophet in the back position will draw 7 and 9 as double wolves."

"I think it's understandable that the 9th police officer didn't take sides, but it's unacceptable that the 10th police officer didn't take sides."

"I still remember that 10 said that he didn't stand on the side and the meaning of player 9 not standing on the side is different. Yes, of course it is different."

"It's fine if 9 doesn't take sides, but if you don't take sides and still suspect 7 and 9 are wolves, then you have to fall into the wolf's pit. If anyone hits you for not taking sides, you will hit him. Fine, you hit me as a wolf, I don't mind."

"Normally, after listening to the speech of player No. 9, a good person would definitely play 7 and 9 so that they don't share the same edge. It would be outrageous to play 7 and 9 so that they could be double wolves."

"Player No. 10, put yourself in his shoes. Your teammate threw gold water at you, but instead of standing by him, you even criticized him for his comments. Is that appropriate?"

"Let's put it this way, Player 10. From the moment you said 7 and 9 might be the double wolves, I felt that you were leading the pace and trying to trick the good guys into playing against 7 and 9 double wolves."

"As for the bandit side of player 4, 6 has already talked about it just now, and it can be summed up in one sentence, words and deeds are different."

"The police officer swore that 7 was the prophet, but the police badge voted for 1. Maybe player 6 was right. 4 wanted to back-trick at first, but when he heard that 7pk's speech was not very good, he rushed forward."

“我点的狼坑是1、4、10、11,容错率在8号玩家,外置位的都可以暂时认下。”

"It is recommended to have 7 checked on 8 nights. He is a card that your police will suspect. If he is a wolf, it's fine. If he is a good person, you will be responsible. Check him."

"Alright, that's all I want to say, officer. Good guy with the bottom card. Stand by player 7. Play 1. That's it. Pass."

[Player No. 4 please speak]

"You are right. I am going to side with Player 1. I think it is a huge mistake to think that Player 7 is the prophet."

"The problem with player 7 is not that he doubts the identity of player 8, or whether his purpose of attacking player 8 can be accepted by the good people. His problem is that his words are contradictory, especially when he attacks player 12 and me with the police badge."

"When he was speaking in PK, he said that he would give the greatest tolerance to player No. 8 and that he could understand why No. 8 was voted on by the bandits. But when he finally clicked on the wolf pit, he still clicked No. 8 in without hesitation."

“1、8、10、11,这是7号玩家点的四狼吧,我想请问他所谓的包容度在哪里?”

"It would be fine if he said that player No. 8 was the tolerance rate, and he directly clicked 8 into the wolf pit, and then told us that he was tolerant of 8. I laughed. What tolerance is this? When did directly clicking someone into the wolf pit become tolerance?"

"He said tolerance one foot, and then he called people wolves the next foot. Isn't this statement self-contradictory? He also advised player No. 8 to turn back. With his attitude and words, can player No. 8 turn back?"

Player No. 4 was on the side of Player 7, but after listening to PK's speech, he felt that he must have been on the wrong side.

7's identity definition and attitude towards 8 are inconsistent. It was clearly said that 8 would be more tolerant and 8 would not be attacked as a wolf for the time being. But when the wolf pit was opened, 8 was counted as one without a second thought. Isn't this a breaking point?

From the fact that player No. 7’s contradictory definition of player No. 8’s identity, it can be seen that player No. 7’s logic is rather confusing, or in other words, his wolf pit is not big enough, so he has to fill in player No. 8 to make up the pit.

"Besides, the police badge flow that player No. 7 used in the PK speech was actually used to test me and player No. 12, saying that we have a tolerance rate. I'm afraid he is here to make fun of us."

"I can't control player 12. Maybe he is a hook, but I warn you that none of the logic in the upper plate is not positive logic. I won't hit player 1 too hard. I also accept the superficial water of player 2. If I am a wolf, what am I doing?"

"From my perspective, plate 7 is the prophet, and the wolf pit is 1, 8, 10, and 11. There is no margin for error, but I don't believe that the demon hunter's board dares to stand up and charge."

"And they don't want to win when 1's speech is not good? Do you think this is normal?"

"I think the water level statement of 2 is good. This is a fact. No matter who is the prophet of 1 or 7, the water level statement of 2 is good."

"But now I can't believe that 2 is a good person. It's impossible for all the wolves to charge. And 1's speech can cause such a big problem. Don't any of you suspect that 1 and 2 are wolves, and 1 deliberately made the conversation more explosive to give 2 an identity?"

"I kept waiting for 5 and 6 to explain the logic to me, but they just insisted that 1 was a traitor and that 2 was the good guy, without realizing that something was wrong on the field."

"Player No. 5, Player No. 6, can't you really hear the explosive point in 7's speech? Player No. 8 has been labeled as a wolf, how can he tolerate 8? My police is on the logic station Beside him, he still has to enter the first police badge stream, or the fault tolerance rate, can this statement recognize him as a prophet?"

Listening to the speech of player No. 4, Gu Feng couldn't help but raise his eyebrows. Finally, someone thought of the problem of 1 and 2 wolves stepping on wolves.

For this board, the Wolves certainly can’t charge as a whole, they must have a hook.

Therefore, there must be deep-water wolves or hook wolves on the field, and it is not even ruled out that the good guys are on the wrong side.

Of course.

The possibility of a good person being on the wrong side is very small. In this case, the good person has to think about the possibility of Barb Wolf, or the possibility of the wolf checking and killing the wolf as an identity.

The fact that Player No. 4 can think of this logic shows that he is most likely a good person. Moreover, such a huge change in his attitude towards his superiors and subordinates does not conform to the behavioral logic of a wolf.

The policeman came up with a lot of logic in the 4th round and said that 1 was not a prophet, and that 2 was a good example. If he was a hook wolf and his identity was already established, how could he suddenly charge in the second round of voting for the police badge?

I don't think a wolf would do such a thing. Only good people would be so unscrupulous.

"Player No. 12, I don't know if you are a good person or a wolf, but I think as a good person, you should not vote for 7 when he plays 4 and 12 police badges. If you really don't want to stand with 1, you can abstain from voting. I really don't understand why you voted for 7."

"If I remember correctly, police officer, you were the first to stand on the side 7, right?"

"At that time, neither player 9 nor player 10 took sides. Under that situation, you recognized player 7 as the prophet, which was a timely help. But player 7 still doubted your identity. Don't you think there is something wrong with him?"

"If he is really a prophet, he will definitely recognize you, instead of pointing you into the fault tolerance rate. In my opinion, 7 talks like this to use us as a resistance."

After a pause, Player 4 spoke again, "Let's talk about Player 8. He voted for 1 for two rounds in a row, even when Player 7 was suspicious of his identity. If his trump card was a wolf, how could he be so stupid as to make people believe that 1 and 8 were the two wolves?"

"In my opinion, player 8 is more like a good guy who dislikes player 7 and doesn't want to stand on his side."

"As for player No. 10, he did point out the wolves 7 and 9 on the police, but I could tell that he actually wanted to side with 7. It was only because of 9's comments that he felt that 7 and 9 might be the wolves, so he said that he would not stand with them for the time being."

"Some people exaggerated this minor problem and even labeled it a wolf because of this. This is too careless."

"And the most suitable player to make a strong jump must be player No. 10. He can backhand a check to player No. 9. Wouldn't it be nice to have two wolves at 7 and 9? On the other hand, letting player No. 1 make a strong jump is a bit inferior."

"You may say that player No. 10 is a Blood Moon Apostle and cannot jump in, but the problem is that Blood Moon Apostles usually play crazy hooks and want to survive to the end. How dare he come up and fight the double wolves of 7 and 9? I don't believe it."

"Let me put it this way. Those who were pushed into the wolf pit by player No. 7 all had some banditry, but it was too much to just kill them. So I think there's something wrong with the wolf pit that came out at No. 7. I don't want to side with him anymore. Now I'm more inclined to think that No. 1 is the prophet."

After the speech of player No. 4, the good people on the field fell into deep thought, especially when No. 4 said that it is impossible for the whole wolf team to charge, there must be a problem with the deep water wolf, which is indeed reasonable.

At least the Blood Moon Apostle will not charge. He wants to survive to the end and kill more people with one sword. It is obviously not possible to achieve this by charging. He can only use the hook.

“我点的狼坑是2、3、5、7,容错率在12号玩家,其实我不想点12的,因为我认为警上大概率就开2、7这两头狼,警下3、5可能是双狼,但12这一票能投到7身上,我就对他的身份有怀疑。”

"Let's listen to what he has to say and see if he can turn back. If not, maybe he is a wolf."

"Today I will play player No. 2. Although his appearance is good, there is nothing I can do. I recognize player No. 1 as the prophet. That's it. I've passed."

(End of this chapter)

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like