1932: Playing with the Japanese Communist Party with a doll

To put it bluntly, in Ambedkar's eyes, Nehru was a waste who had high aspirations but low skills, who appeared to be on the left but was actually wavering. He could be used but could never be trusted.

So, does Roy and Ambedkar, who believe in socialism, advocate the liberation of untouchables, and intend to establish a great unity of the proletariat between workers and peasants, approve of Taiwan?

Nor is it.

He believes that "the theory of class struggle supremacy ignores the reality of India. In India, caste is more deeply rooted than class. Caste discrimination will not disappear because of class struggle. The communist theory that is divorced from India's reality will instead aggravate caste oppression."

Therefore, although he never attacked Roy directly as he did Gandhi, Ambedkar clearly rejected "communism" after declaring his independence from Hinduism in 1935 and founding the "Independent Labour Party" in 1936.

It is no exaggeration to say that this person is a super troll. In order to liberate the untouchables, he trolls everyone. The problem is that later facts proved that most of the things he trolled were actually correct:

Regardless of whether Gandhi was the "false savior" as Ambedkar said, all his actions and efforts ultimately failed to unite and liberate India. As a Hindu leader who advocated "non-violence", he was eventually killed in a violent assassination by radical Hindus.

Bose was obsessed with liberating India by force and violently overthrowing British rule, even collaborating with the German Nazis and the Japanese to achieve this goal. However, without class and caste liberation, his troops were still plagued by internal oppression and had no fighting power. He ultimately died in Taipei without having accomplished anything.

Nehru, the "Ten Days and Ten Nights Brother", has proved with countless facts that he is indeed the founder of Mahayana Buddhism, but he is only a founder, and his methods are much worse than those of the later ones.

As for Luo Yi's situation, Ambedkar also accurately predicted it:

The emphasis on "class struggle" has, to a certain extent, ignored the realities of India - it simply cannot gain the understanding and response of the general public;

Openly opposed to Stalin, believing that he had betrayed Lenin's ideals and turned the Soviet Union into a paradise for bureaucratic gangs - disliked by the Soviet Union:

He believed that the Communist Party of India, which he had founded, had "betrayed the revolution" by supporting Britain in its fight against the Nazis during World War II. He was expelled from the Communist Party of India;

Strongly criticized Gandhi's non-violent non-cooperation as passive resistance and regarded Gandhi as "an obstacle to the Indian revolution" - relations with Gandhi deteriorated;

He accused Nehru of "elite nationalism" that neglected the interests of workers and peasants - Nehru was very unhappy with him;

They felt that Bose's nationalist revolution could not resolve class issues and had "dangerous speculative tendencies"...

Although on the surface, Roy and Ambedkar are both big trolls, Roy is more like a "troll" who emphasizes fundamentalist theories while ignoring reality, and has a clear "extreme left flavor."

Fujiwara no Kanezane certainly had "bad intentions" in inviting a big troll like Ambegar. He just wanted him to "add fuel to the fire" among the other three factions that were already full of conflicts.

As long as a little respect is shown... no, as long as "equal treatment" and non-discrimination against "untouchable groups", Ambedkar, who comes from an untouchable family and is extremely sensitive in this regard, will be willing to "help".

For an ordinary Chinese person who has received a complete red education and has gained experience at the grassroots level, it is extremely simple to look at the world equally.

As expected, after a brief handshake and greeting with Fujiwara Kanezane, who had invited him and had gained his favor, Ambegar immediately launched into a full-throttle attack, but his target shifted from the criminals themselves to their "masters":

"Oh my dear Mr. Gandhi! You claim to be 'non-violent', but you allow your followers to use violence to abuse others? What? You don't allow it? So, are you starting to spread your nonsense that 'rape is just a moral issue' again?"

"You're truly a prominent figure representing the interests of the upper castes. If one day a lower caste man raped an upper caste woman, would you also stand up and casually say, 'It's just a moral issue'?"

N

"Mr. Boss, I highly commend your decision to kill these despicable criminals. If possible, I would also like to kill them. But what is the basis for your direct execution? Are there any laws to justify your rash calls for killing?"

"What? Special measures for special times? If constitutionalism, democracy, and the rule of law can't even be achieved, then what's the difference between post-independence India and the past?"

"Mr. Nehru, the law is fair and just. It shouldn't be used as a tool for individuals to display prestige or gain benefits. What do you mean by 'indigenous punishment'? Is it the so-called 'honor killing'? Isn't this lynching?"

Mr. Roy, as a Communist Party member, you are committed to liberating the people. Your behavior just now does not seem to be the same as mine. Why don't you severely criticize Gandhi and others? "

Roy was relatively okay after being "taught a lesson" by Ambedkar, but Gandhi, Bose, Nehru and others were all directly defeated.

Lord Shiva, I'm lucky I didn't bother you. Why are you, a lowly person, trying to show off to me?

Don't think you're that great just because you have the support of the British and Fujiwara no Kanezane!

I'm going to spray you to death!

The enraged people no longer cared about the presence of outsiders like Fujiwara no Kanezane, and started to argue with Ambegar without any regard for decency.

You call me "radical", I call you "conservative and compromising";

You call me "fascist", I say you are "idealistic";

You said I “only care about the upper castes”, I said you “only care about the untouchables”;

You say I “don’t understand industry”, I say you “don’t understand India”;

You say I am "not free", I say you are "not equal"..

Shameful?

Lose your ass!

I'll kill you heretic first!

587 The Governor-General of India visits

In short, this quarrel inside the "Indian Pavilion" that was like that of the aunties in the vegetable market not only attracted Zhao Ziqi and others to listen in, but also representatives from other countries quietly gathered over to watch the fun.

Especially representatives from all over Southeast Asia.

Although India's independence is regarded as an important symbol of the anti-imperialist struggle in Southeast Asia, anyone with a little political acumen can see that once India becomes independent, it will definitely become a well-deserved superpower in Southeast Asia.

If the "Indian region" becomes the "India nation," what attitude will it adopt towards other neighboring countries and regions?

Now that everyone is united in resisting the white people, they can only reluctantly cooperate and show mutual support from afar. After the white people are driven away, will they still maintain this "honeymoon period"?

Anyway, the group of people who have more contact with "Indians" are not very optimistic. So, while they support India's independence, they are also worried about what will happen to the other side after independence.

However, watching this "Indian Civil War" unfold before their eyes, a thought suddenly occurred to everyone, one that they had never thought about before or had suppressed:

How could I have almost forgotten that this "India" cannot be called "India"?

How can we gain independence and establish a country when there are such huge differences among ourselves?

Can their so-called "independence and nation-building" really be called "independence and nation-building"?

Obviously not!

The entire northern part of Southeast Asia, except for India, is largely influenced by Chinese culture. At the very least, they all understand the simple principle of "brothers are close to each other, but we must defend ourselves against external aggression."

In short - "If you have anything to say, let's talk behind closed doors and don't embarrass ourselves in front of outsiders."

As a result, this group of Indians first caused a scandal of "fighting for the right to rape", and then quarreled fiercely in front of so many outsiders like us, and their words also exposed many core contradictions within the Indian independence community.

Good fellow, it's fine if ordinary people don't understand, but you guys who claim to be "future leaders of India" don't understand either?

If you don't even understand this, how can you rule "India"?

Can't lead it?

If this is the case, then do we not have to hide under the banner of "India"?

As we all know, in 1933, the entire Southeast Asia region was under the rule of Britain, France, the United States and other countries except for the nominal one. Everyone wanted to get rid of colonialism and oppression;

Therefore, in addition to politicians like Gandiroi who were directly invited by Fujiwara no Kanezane, there were also many "wild independence activists" who attended the Greater East Asia Conference.

Anyway, His Royal Highness Prince Kanezane said that anyone who wants to attend the conference can submit an application to the "Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Five-Star Eastern Republic". As long as they are not dangerous elements, they will generally be approved.

Even if I can't speak out and rely on Fujiwara no Kanezane's power to become independent, I can still see what the current "strongest in Asia" is going to do. At least I can still make a living for a few days.

Thus, it is not just India, Siam, Indonesia, and the Philippines, which had just received the independence permit from President Springfield, which were “countries” that had already raised a clear banner of independence;

Even Burma, which still belonged to British India (at that time it was a province of India) and many large and small political forces in the traditional "Indian region" sent people here.

Originally they just wanted to watch the fun, but now Gandhi and others' behavior made some of them think, "Since 'India' wants independence from the British, can we also gain independence from 'India'?"

This is exactly what someone wants.

After watching enough of the show, Fujiwara Kanemi clapped his hands and said loudly:

Everyone, I have other things to do. If you have no objection, we will take the person away!"

If it were a Chinese or ordinary politician from other secular countries, they would have realized by now that they were getting carried away. Even if they disagreed with the core issue of releasing the prisoners, they would have known not to continue arguing in front of outsiders.

But these Indian gentlemen ignored them and were immersed in the quarrel. When they finally heard what was said, they had long forgotten their original purpose. After agreeing to arrest people, they continued to quarrel and even started fighting.

Now, the goal of "solving the problem without causing conflict and setting a trap for the Indians" was achieved, and Fujiwara no Kaneshige left leisurely.

What happened in the "Indian Pavilion" spread quickly in Shenyang and among representatives from various countries.

For ordinary people in the Five-Star Eastern Republic, in addition to hating the Indians who already had a bad reputation even more, Fujiwara no Kanemitsu's image in their hearts naturally rose to a higher level.

Although I had heard that this prince was very kind to ordinary people, it was still a bit beyond my imagination that as an emperor, he would risk a conflict with the Indians and a diplomatic crisis, and personally lead a team into a dangerous place to save a mere waiter.

This kind of "protecting one's own children" behavior brings an unparalleled sense of security to ordinary people. More and more people believe that if they encounter misfortune one day, Fujiwara no Kanezane will never abandon them, and at least will seek justice for them.

Fujiwara no Kanezane's insistence on trying criminals according to the law from beginning to end also gave the people a great sense of security and trust in the law.

To be honest, after hearing that Fujiwara no Kanezane's maid was nearly humiliated, everyone thought that even if Fujiwara no Kanezane killed those assholes on the spot or had them killed assholes, it would be reasonable and legal, but he insisted on not doing so;

Since Your Highness has taken the lead in abiding by the law, who else has the right not to?

Since the law is fair and just, why don't we wait for the judgment of the law?

Since the law can protect us and give us justice, why not trust it?

For the sake of His Highness Kanezane, let's give the law some respect.jPg.

The legal awareness of many people in the Five-Star Eastern Republic has begun to grow stronger, and they always ask "What does the law stipulate about this matter?" and "Have we violated the law?"

As for other groups not belonging to the Five-Star Eastern Republic, while they envied and formed similar impressions, a small number of people also saw another side of Fujiwara Kanezane:

You are really scheming.

Obviously, this was such an offensive act, but he not only successfully captured the criminal but also caused internal strife among the Indians without using his power or having a serious conflict with them. This cannot be easily explained by the phrase "high moral character and righteousness".

If I'm not mistaken, His Highness Hachiman is definitely not as passionate, immature and reckless as he appears to be...

Shortly after.

A middle-aged man with a long face, a high forehead, a bald head, a pointed nose, and a large white beard, with typical British aristocratic features, took a sip of the newly served black tea and revealed a surprised expression:

"This black tea is brewed so well. Your Highness's maid's skills are no less than the best head maid at Buckingham Palace.

Upon hearing this, the agent standing by bowed slightly, holding the plate, appearing very elegant and polite:

“Thank you for your compliment, Your Excellency.

Fujiwara Kanezane in front of her laughed and said:

"Hahaha... Although she is indeed the head maid with the best overall abilities under me, she is not the best at brewing black tea."

"Oh? There's actually someone who can surpass her?

"Yes, I have a maid who is now in the United States on business. If there is a chance someday, I will let Your Excellency taste her cooking skills.

"I'm really looking forward to that day..."

N

The two of them exchanged meaningless banter for a long time before the bearded man leisurely got to the point:

“Your Highness is really good at tricking those natives (what the British call “Indians”) like dogs.

"Oh? I don't quite understand what your Excellency means.

"How Your Highness instigated the natives to achieve his goal? Others may still be in the dark, but does Your Highness think that I, the Governor-General of India, can't see it?"

"Hahahaha... I really can't hide it from you... Mr. Count..."

The visitor was the British Governor-General of India at that time, Freeman Thomas, the first Earl of Wellington, personally appointed by the British royal family.

He succeeded Lord Irwin as the Governor-General of India on April 18, 1931. During his tenure, he firmly implemented the policy of "superficial reforms plus strong suppression", and dealt a heavy blow to any attempt to promote Indian independence.

Such a seasoned imperialist warrior would naturally be very wary of Fujiwara no Kanezane's convening of the Greater East Asia Conference and his invitation to Gandhi and others. He had been paying attention to it from a long time ago and even tried to prevent Gandhi and others from attending.

If it weren't for some external pressure and concerns that the beating of the "Salt Marching Army" would trigger a severe international public opinion crisis like the last time, he even planned to arrest all these people and put them in jail, and release them after the meeting was over.

Although he couldn't stop it openly, it was the duty of the Governor-General of India to find out what the Japanese wanted to do to India. That's why he came all the way to Shenyang.

However, through a series of clues, Earl Thomas soon discovered that Fujiwara no Kanezane was only shouting "national independence" loudly on the surface, but he had no particularly strong tendency to promote Indian independence.

Especially yesterday's action by Fujiwara no Kanezane not only did not contribute to India's independence, but instead completely exposed India's internal contradictions and created a considerable obstacle to India's independence;

Of course, this also left a lot of room for the Earl to negotiate with him on behalf of Britain.

The Earl of Wellington stroked his beard and said with a smile:

"Haha, Your Highness, this 'divide and conquer, strike in sequence' method, we have been familiar with it for hundreds of years. Although Your Highness's methods are more sophisticated and less obvious, it is still the same after all!"

"Okay! I admit that I just want to split India, cause some trouble for you British, help the Empire of Japan gain greater advantages in Southeast Asia, and also allow me to move to a higher level.

Seeing this, Fujiwara no Kanezane frankly admitted his thoughts and then leaned back casually:

"What, then, does your Excellency propose? To bring charges?"

He was not afraid to say these words because, by 1933, it was already very clear that Japan and the British Empire were competing for the Southeast Asia region. Even if he said that he had no such intention, the British would not believe him.

On the contrary, according to his understanding of these so-called "British gentlemen" at that time, "killing with a knife while smiling and snatching benefits politely" is more to their liking.

As for "dividing India"?