The flower is a tulip [Chu Liuxiang]
Chapter 83 Reunion and parting
Can find the first volume of the novel barnyard class
It's a pity that the first book was left in Taipei and I didn't take it down
So I had no choice but to pick up another missing person notice by Zhang Dachun to relieve my addiction
This novel is said to be about some people Zhang Dachun once met
I often think about some problems, and I often think about everyone I have met and experienced in the past 30 years
Some are long-term friends and confidants, with whom we have been together for more than 20 years
Some only have a one-sided relationship, and can't even remember the other person's name
Everything that I can remember has more or less "unique" features
We can understand no one any more than others can understand ourselves
Even we can't understand ourselves
Only by understanding this incomprehension can we create characters beyond the scope of our own thinking
People are used to thinking with their own values
But I don't know my own values, my own ideas, may not be other people's values, other people's ideas
If such people create novels and scripts, they will have blind spots
that is impossible to escape
for example:
Write a story where the protagonist is walking on the road, and the wallet is stolen by a child
After the protagonist catches the child, the writer may design the following possible reactions for the protagonist:
[-]: beat up the child
[-]: Take it to the police station
Three: ask the child why he wants to steal money, and see if he deserves sympathy
Four: Seeing that he is underage, let him go and tell him not to do it next time?
Either way is possible
But if there is an author, he thinks that beating the thief is too vicious, and sending it to the police station will make the thief have a criminal record, and it is too complicated to ask the reason
So as long as it's a kind hero
I will definitely warn the thief earnestly, don't do it again next time.
Then the thief will leave with gratitude and change his bad habits from then on
Therefore, in this kind of work, even if the protagonist encounters a thief ten times, he will let the thief go ten times
Then the ten thieves will reform ten times
This kind of author made the biggest mistake, that is "I think~"
And this "I think" will even extend to other supporting roles
As a result, the whole work only revolves around one value, a kind of consensus that comes from nowhere
There are too many such authors, too many to be included
There's a certain well-known romance novelist whose work is truly amazing
Love is invincible, true love is the most beautiful.So for the sake of love, it’s okay to be the third party in someone’s marriage
Indeed, what the author wants to state is "the blindness of love", and falling in love with a married man is also a good subject
But the scary thing is that in his works, including other people, everyone also "blesses" this relationship
Anyone who opposes the protagonist and the heroine will definitely be labeled as a first-class villain
Including the first wife, the younger brother of the first wife, the father of the first wife, or the mother-in-law (it has to be described as an ugly mother-in-law)
The whole work is full of the "values" of the author himself, and those who disagree are not caring, and are villains
The resulting work is thus flattened
It is also because of this reason that many writers become popular in the first work, but the second and third works start to weaken.
Because what he writes is his "I think"
The human mind is very complicated, how complicated is it?unreasonably complex
To what extent is it unreasonable?
Someone broke up in love and went home and hacked his parents to death. The reason was: "Who told you to give birth to me and suffer?"
It doesn't matter if he is angry, or after thinking about it, he feels that life is unlovable
Anyway, that's what he thought
I often think about how these people who I can't understand think about things?
And try to cut into more of the same things from their point of view and speculate on their behavior
In addition to the multi-faceted people, there are more different faces of different people
Therefore, I always tell myself when I am working, never think about "what should I think" but think about "what should he think?"
Sanxian Yunlin tiger tail cat litter
It's a pity that the first book was left in Taipei and I didn't take it down
So I had no choice but to pick up another missing person notice by Zhang Dachun to relieve my addiction
This novel is said to be about some people Zhang Dachun once met
I often think about some problems, and I often think about everyone I have met and experienced in the past 30 years
Some are long-term friends and confidants, with whom we have been together for more than 20 years
Some only have a one-sided relationship, and can't even remember the other person's name
Everything that I can remember has more or less "unique" features
We can understand no one any more than others can understand ourselves
Even we can't understand ourselves
Only by understanding this incomprehension can we create characters beyond the scope of our own thinking
People are used to thinking with their own values
But I don't know my own values, my own ideas, may not be other people's values, other people's ideas
If such people create novels and scripts, they will have blind spots
that is impossible to escape
for example:
Write a story where the protagonist is walking on the road, and the wallet is stolen by a child
After the protagonist catches the child, the writer may design the following possible reactions for the protagonist:
[-]: beat up the child
[-]: Take it to the police station
Three: ask the child why he wants to steal money, and see if he deserves sympathy
Four: Seeing that he is underage, let him go and tell him not to do it next time?
Either way is possible
But if there is an author, he thinks that beating the thief is too vicious, and sending it to the police station will make the thief have a criminal record, and it is too complicated to ask the reason
So as long as it's a kind hero
I will definitely warn the thief earnestly, don't do it again next time.
Then the thief will leave with gratitude and change his bad habits from then on
Therefore, in this kind of work, even if the protagonist encounters a thief ten times, he will let the thief go ten times
Then the ten thieves will reform ten times
This kind of author made the biggest mistake, that is "I think~"
And this "I think" will even extend to other supporting roles
As a result, the whole work only revolves around one value, a kind of consensus that comes from nowhere
There are too many such authors, too many to be included
There's a certain well-known romance novelist whose work is truly amazing
Love is invincible, true love is the most beautiful.So for the sake of love, it’s okay to be the third party in someone’s marriage
Indeed, what the author wants to state is "the blindness of love", and falling in love with a married man is also a good subject
But the scary thing is that in his works, including other people, everyone also "blesses" this relationship
Anyone who opposes the protagonist and the heroine will definitely be labeled as a first-class villain
Including the first wife, the younger brother of the first wife, the father of the first wife, or the mother-in-law (it has to be described as an ugly mother-in-law)
The whole work is full of the "values" of the author himself, and those who disagree are not caring, and are villains
The resulting work is thus flattened
It is also because of this reason that many writers become popular in the first work, but the second and third works start to weaken.
Because what he writes is his "I think"
The human mind is very complicated, how complicated is it?unreasonably complex
To what extent is it unreasonable?
Someone broke up in love and went home and hacked his parents to death. The reason was: "Who told you to give birth to me and suffer?"
It doesn't matter if he is angry, or after thinking about it, he feels that life is unlovable
Anyway, that's what he thought
I often think about how these people who I can't understand think about things?
And try to cut into more of the same things from their point of view and speculate on their behavior
In addition to the multi-faceted people, there are more different faces of different people
Therefore, I always tell myself when I am working, never think about "what should I think" but think about "what should he think?"
Sanxian Yunlin tiger tail cat litter
You'll Also Like
-
Douluo: The vests I play have all become gods
Chapter 145 2 hours ago -
I see Qingshan
Chapter 89 2 hours ago -
After the cannon fodder sect accepted me as a disciple, all members ascended
Chapter 80 2 hours ago -
Live broadcast shocked the ancients, and the baby returned to the modern era to be the group's
Chapter 136 2 hours ago -
Awakening divorce, the little female is scrambled by all the big guys
Chapter 133 2 hours ago -
The abandoned cannon fodder girl's path to immortality
Chapter 149 2 hours ago -
Rebirth of the Millennial: Getting Rich After Parents Get Laid Off
Chapter 148 2 hours ago -
After understanding the language of animals, I quit the entertainment circle and started working for
Chapter 124 2 hours ago -
Farmer girl swaps husbands: buys a sickly villain and pampers him
Chapter 149 2 hours ago -
Borrowing Luck? The True Daughter can rebound damage after rebirth
Chapter 36 2 hours ago