Spy Wars: After identifying the identity, turn the senior spy against the

If they want to design, they also have to think about how to deal with the judges' group instead of giving up these opportunities.

The situation of the judge group is rather special, so we have to think about how to deal with it in advance before we can give any guarantees.

No matter what the result is, it must be in their own hands so that they can figure out how to arrange it.

If we look at the arrangements that the judges' group should have thought of, then we will not deal with these problems directly. We will not hand them over again.

The judges' panel was an arrangement and opportunity that they needed to think about in advance, and they had not thought about giving up these arrangements directly.

No matter what, you have to think about the selection opportunities for the judge group. You don’t have to make these arrangements anymore, nor do you have to choose to let go directly.

You need to find out the plans and arrangements for the judges' group first, and think about it in advance, so as not to give up the opportunity.

Since you can clearly see the arrangements of the judges' panel, you don't have to make the choice to just let go of these opportunities. You have to think carefully before making the choice.

Once we find out the plan for the Judges Group, we can already think of their future arrangements and there is no need to give up these opportunities.

Designing a panel of judges is very difficult, and not everyone can do it easily. They still have to think about it in advance.

The Judge Team’s plans cannot be completely handed over to others. They can still think about how to deal with it and will not give up directly.

Only by finding clues and plans about the Judge Group can you make these choices without having to consider other people's arrangements.

Originally, there was a choice in the design this time, so there was no need to consider their subsequent arrangements.

Every method must be taken into your own hands, so as not to give up these opportunities directly.

Although they can clearly see the plan of the judge team, they have to think about it in advance before they can make arrangements.

Regardless of whether the final result is what they want, it cannot be solved by simply giving up.

Since arrangements have been made in advance, we cannot just give up these opportunities. Once we have made a choice, we must think it through in advance.

No one can judge whether the tasks and plans have been successful, but at least it seems to be relatively stable now and no other problems have arisen.

To figure out how to change, he has to take it into his own hands to carry it out smoothly, and there is no need to think too much.

How to respond to opportunities for change depends on the foundation and confidence of the judging panel.

Having fought against the Judge Team many times, I will not waste all these opportunities. This way, the opportunities given to me will still be useful.

Seeing the limitations of the judges' group, they will give these opportunities to others to handle, as there are not many opportunities that can actually be given.

This was not the first day that the consulate had fought against the Judge Team, and it was very clear what it would encounter and what it would suffer.

If you encounter real dangers, you must think about how to deal with them, so as not to waste all these opportunities.

It seems that the judge group has already had an idea, so there is no need to give up these opportunities.

"We also need to resolve these issues as soon as possible before we can consider how to deal with them later."

"I won't say there's no solution. There are always opportunities and arrangements."

"This test won't be ineffective. After all, it's an opportunity to work together, and we won't waste it again."

"As long as we can cooperate, there are always reasons to continue, and we won't waste these opportunities."

"Being able to solve the problem together will definitely be effective, and I won't give up on these arrangements."

"After this trial, it is clear that our plan can succeed. It is not impossible to say that the plan cannot be carried out well."

The two of them had no other choice. They both had better ways to deal with the situation, and it was not like they had no chance to give up.

If they fail to handle the opportunity well, there will be no result no matter how they look at it. It is better to arrange these options in advance.

If they can't come up with a better solution, they can think of these arrangements in advance, and then they will have the direction of these options.

If you can't see that they have these choices, then there is no need to continue.

As long as there is a solution, there is no need for them to give up the opportunity and think about it before finding a solution.

If you go against the judge group, you still have to think about the worst consequences in advance to ensure that these arrangements will not happen again.

They can clearly see the choices made by the judges' group, and they also have to think about how to respond in advance.

After seeing the arrangements and plans of the judges' group, they need to think about how to respond in advance.

Once the solution is solved, you can think about it in advance from here, and there is no need to hand over these arrangements.

They didn't see any solution, so they still needed to figure out how to deal with it, and they didn't think about wasting these opportunities.

The matter is already settled, and if they want to solve it, it is not something that can be carried out smoothly just by leaving it to them. They still have to think about how to do it.

If they want to resolve the issue with the Judges Group, they have to think about how to deal with the choices and cannot leave the arrangements they have made in the hands of others.

Every solution is useful, and they can still think about how to deal with the choices, so there is no need to make these arrangements.