After dreaming of getting rich, I dressed up as a collapsed idol

Everyone has a sense of justice in their heart, more or less.

In reality, for various reasons, most people's sense of justice cannot be expressed.

In the Internet world, without so many concerns, this emotion will be amplified.

Then you can see people frequently speaking out under news reports about unfair incidents.

There was a psychological factor behind being guided by Chen Youde to attack Lu Qingfeng.

They believe they are on the side of justice, exposing someone who benefits from lying.

And after realizing that they had been fooled and wronged, Lu Qingfeng was chosen to uphold justice for him by this group of people.

Moreover, he spoke with even more anger and rage than before.

Chen Youde's eyes never left his phone. As soon as Lu Qingfeng posted on Weibo, he saw it.

After reading the entire blog post, his scalp went numb.

Lu Qingfeng did produce evidence, but the other party did not actually fall into the self-proof trap he set.

The key points that the other party wants to say are in the last few paragraphs.

The young man opposite anticipated his prediction and directly pointed out that the evidence he produced would be considered invalid.

In fact, he really wanted to do so.

But now it seems that the effect is absolutely close to nothing.

On the contrary, it will gain further recognition from the public.

What’s even more amazing are the last two sentences.

Considering the cause and effect, anyone who participated in the attack would have to slap themselves in the face if they saw this.

The other party is actually guiding the emotions of netizens.

Fuck, intellectuals are all corrupt.

Chen Youde cursed in his heart.

What he fears least is others reasoning with him, because he deeply understands a theory: reason cannot be made clear on the Internet.

Therefore, he never messes with those artists who have fans in fan clubs.

Because those fans are completely unreasonable. If you dare to mess with their idols, they will rush towards you without thinking.

The situation he is facing now is actually no different from offending those traffic artists.

Under his latest Weibo post, calls for him to apologize are growing louder and louder.

It is impossible to apologize.

If he really does this, will he still be able to maintain his image as a cultural critic?

But he also knew that continuing to follow his previous thinking and denying the evidence presented by the other party would no longer be effective.

The most important thing right now is to break the atmosphere created by the other party.

He thought about it, contacted his employees, and asked him to find a few network traffic studios, that is, water armies.

Then I deleted and reduced some content, sorted out the wording, and posted another Weibo.

“I’ve read all the so-called notes and drafts, so I won’t say whether they’re true or false.

Let’s assume for now that these works are all written by you. Let’s not talk about other works for now. You can use your imagination and ideas from reading books to cover them up.

I would like to ask Mr. Lu, what do you think of the work "Mountain Moon Records".

The literary and ideological content of this short article is beyond the understanding of a teenager like you who has not yet entered society.

Don’t tell me that this is a summary of what you learned from reading a book. What kind of book can give you such profound insights?

At your age, it is even less likely that you have had such an experience.

That is, it is even more interesting when you look at other people's lives. How long have you observed this person?

Did it start when you were young?

If you can answer this question for me, I will apologize."

The Weibo post was just released and the internet trolls showed up.

"I don't take any stance, objectively speaking, this is indeed the case."

"Geniuses certainly exist, but I don't believe in saints who are born with knowledge."

"Yes, no matter how smart you are, you can't write about things you haven't experienced."

……

It is still questioning the authenticity of the article, but it has shifted from a comprehensive perspective to a specific point.

This is also Chen Youde's usual method.