Return to 78: Why are all the Americans panicking about doing scientific research?

Chapter 611: Primitive Street Fighting Versus High-Tech Warfare

There is no good or bad weapon, the problem is the person who operates the weapon.

The same reason.

The products exported by Northern Machinery Group to Latvia are not military equipment, but as long as one is willing to use his brain, civilian products can also be turned into military weapons.

Multi-purpose vehicles from Northern Machinery Group are exported to Latvia under the name of various types of civilian vehicles.

At the same time, the group's drones for various purposes also appeared on the export list.

For many years, Latin America has held oil in its left hand and aid from the Soviet Union in its right hand.

The military-industrial system is more complete than that of other desert countries.

Abdul was also an ambitious warlord who knew that sooner or later he would fall out with the superpower, so he stockpiled a large amount of arms in advance.

Arms, ruling power, funds and manpower are not a problem. The weakness of the country of Lak is that its army does not have high-tech combat capabilities.

In 1991, the multinational coalition led by the United States officially launched an attack on Latin America.

Operation Desert Storm lasted for dozens of days, and the number of casualties in the United States was only a few hundred.

Not only did they annihilate the most elite commander's guard of the Rak country, they also displayed all kinds of advanced weapons, and achieved the result of defeating more than 100,000 people at the cost of a few hundred people.

This time, Lin Kaifeng decided to give the United States something different.

The United States has high-tech tactics, and the Democratic Republic of Korea also has its own strengths.

After half a month, the US troops attacking the country of Lak were surprised to find that the regular army of Lak was giving up direct combat with the US troops.

Instead, they moved into the interior of each city, trying to turn the city into a battlefield.

One large city after another became obstacles to stop the US military's offensive.

The military plans to completely end the war in Lak within a month, overthrow Abdul's rule, and support a puppet to gain control of Lak.

With the power of a great victory, he declared war on Persia, killed two birds with one stone, and completed the military control of the desert world.

Never expected it.

Abdul's army voluntarily gave up its position.

As a result, the effectiveness of the high-tech warfare that the United States is proud of has been reduced to the lowest level.

The air strike force, combined with satellite navigation and precision guidance technology, can easily destroy all the superior forces in Abdul's hands.

The current complex situation does not allow the US military to use high-tech tactics in urban battles and street fighting.

"Damn Abdul, there must be someone behind him plotting!"

"As we all know, Abdul's combat thinking is the same as that of the Soviet Union. They are both adherents of continental military doctrine and believe that only the army can determine the outcome of a war. The air force and navy are merely helpers of the army, not the main combat forces."

"I suggest giving up the fight for these cities and heading straight for the capital of the Rak Nation."

"Yes, as long as Abdul is captured, the war will be over."

On the other side of the ocean, in the President’s office.

President Reagan summoned military officers to urgently discuss the current situation.

The military formulated a package of rapid offensive plans and dispatched the air force to carry out indiscriminate bombing on Lak's military facilities in order to destroy Lak's war potential.

Immediately afterwards, ground forces advanced rapidly.

Through information-based coordination, air-ground integration, air-space integration and other tactics, we can achieve the greatest casualties with the least casualties.

The current war situation is moving in the opposite direction of what the United States hopes for.

An Air Force general said coldly: "Mr. President, whether there is someone behind Abdul or not, it will not affect our military offensive."

"At present, all of Abdul's main forces are hiding in cities. These cities are spread across various transportation hubs. If our soldiers want to go there, they will inevitably be harassed and attacked by the garrisons in various places. The best way is to carry out strategic bombing on these cities."

"During the previous offensive, the city was full of enemies. I think we should not continue to tolerate this. Whether they are soldiers or civilians, once they stand on the opposite side of us, they are all our enemies."

The Air Force's statement was echoed by other services.

The Army's attitude was the most resolute.

After decades of development, the United States' high-tech tactics, multi-service coordination, and electronic combat theories have become very mature.

The navy, army and air force can guarantee with confidence that even if the opponent is the Soviet Union, the United States will be able to win.

The country of Lak did the opposite and engaged in the most primitive urban street fighting.

The defenders on all fronts retreated to the city. Once the city is strategically surrounded, the available troops of the United States will drop rapidly.

The remaining motorized forces will find it difficult to carry out the planned strategic tasks.

On the other hand, no one knew how much arms and supplies Abdul had stockpiled in the city.

If the battle line drags on too long and the war lasts too long, anti-war sentiment in the country will inevitably continue to heat up.

General Reagan sighed and said, "Generals, from your perspective, I think any method of attacking cities is not excessive. If it were the United States' national position, we would never conduct strategic air strikes on cities. This year is 1987, not 1897. The eyes of the world are on the country of Lak, on us."

"There are thousands of journalists going to the battlefield to cover the incident. If we indiscriminately bomb the city, Western countries may choose to withdraw from the coalition because they cannot bear the pressure of public opinion, leaving the United States alone on the battlefield. This is not in our interests and is not the best attack plan."

The Soviet Union has not yet collapsed, and the United States and the West still have some face to save.

The United States has repeatedly declared that its foreign military actions are for freedom and peace.

The United States has used this high-sounding banner to perfection.

In this situation, the United States sent a large number of aircraft to indiscriminately bomb various cities in the country of Lak. What is it doing?

Is it to bring peace to the desert world, or to carry out humanitarian destruction?

More than 20 years ago, the resistance the United States encountered in Monkey Country was very similar to the current situation.

American soldiers are armed to the teeth and have powerful weapons and equipment.

The monkey country soldiers fought against the United States in an almost primitive way.

With no other options left, the United States launched indiscriminate attacks.

Use various chemical bombs to destroy forests and villages where enemy troops can hide.

Napalm, white phosphorus bombs, and Agent Orange, which destroyed large areas of forests.

Almost all of the United States has used it.

even.

The United States uses artificial rainfall control as a meteorological weapon against its enemies.

Even if the entire process is kept confidential, there is no wall that is impenetrable.

As one inhumane military act after another was exposed by the media, anti-war sentiment among the American people reached its peak.

Ultimately, the United States was forced to withdraw its troops.

An army lieutenant general raised an issue that could not be ignored. If the city was not subjected to strategic bombing, the only option was to send infantry in and engage in bloody street fighting.

Can the United States afford such casualties?

The bloodiness of street fighting is well known.

Should the lives of American soldiers be sacrificed to achieve the strategic goal of the Round Office, or should the simplest way be to kill a large number of enemy soldiers and civilians and force the enemy to abandon the idea of ​​relying on urban warfare?

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like