I, strive for the prosperity of the motherland! 【system】

These comments received a lot of likes, with many people expressing their support.

Of course, there are still many people who disagree with these views and respond in the comments below.

For a while, people with different opinions were arguing fiercely in various comment sections.

“This store didn’t put up a sign with the words ‘Free extra noodles’ in a conspicuous place! And even if some stores put up a sign saying ‘Free extra noodles’, some customers are shy and don’t dare to ask for more noodles, so they deserve not to be full? What about those who order takeout? How can I get free extra noodles?”

"If you give boys a larger portion, you should give girls a larger portion as well! Everyone who comes into the restaurant is here to eat, so why should we distinguish between men and women? When you treat customers differently based on their gender, you are already discriminating on the basis of their gender!"

"If you differentiate between large and small bowls, you don't have to add free noodles. Men and women can order the right amount according to their appetite. Is the person who asks this kind of question stupid or is he deliberately trying to argue?"

As for the comments comparing shoe size to meal portion sizes, the debate is even more intense.

Some people think it makes sense.

"That's right! Clothes and shoes come in different sizes and use different amounts of materials, but they're still sold at the same price!"

"Like, I think it's reasonable for the boss to balance costs by adjusting the portion size while meeting the different needs of different groups."

Many people think that this is a substitution of concepts.

"This logic is simply a calculation on a crooked tree! Clothes and shoes are sold with design and brand value. Regardless of size, the material and labor costs fluctuate very little! The "size" of clothes and shoes will not affect its core value, because you buy the style, not the weight of the material! But food is different. Consumers buy sufficient energy and satiety. This is the most straightforward equivalent exchange. The money you pay directly corresponds to how much you can eat. Every bite is a real expense of food. The "portion" of food is the core value itself. If you don't even understand basic business logic, how dare you talk about "reasonableness"?"

"According to you, should women wear wristbands at buffets? Should gym equipment be divided by gender? According to this distorted logic, even the air we breathe will be taxed based on gender. Anyway, you can always distort everything with prejudice!"

"What is truly reasonable is to price according to cost. Merchants use the "difference in male and female portions" to save costs and make a profit, but let consumers pay for this gender-based marketing. This is clearly a calculation by the merchants. Why should customers accept it?"

"I suggest that the restaurant be renamed 'Daqing Canteen'. Since you are promoting the idea of male superiority over female, why not use foot bindings as tablecloths and give female customers three-inch golden lotus plates - in your eyes, women are born to eat on their knees anyway."

"I found that most of the people who think that reducing the amount of food for female customers is reasonable are men. I want to ask, what does this have to do with you? It is not you who are treated differently in cafeterias and restaurants. You did not eat less. Women who want to spend the same money to eat a normal amount of food are not trying to steal food from your bowls! We ask for the same price and the same amount, not to reduce the amount for you. Where do you get so many opinions?!"

The female equal rights blogger who follows Su Xing, "Hold on to your qualities and don't let go", even recorded a special oral video on this topic.

She said: "Using the size of clothes and shoes to compare the difference in meal portions for male and female customers, the core logical flaw is that it equates "differences in specifications based on voluntary choice" with "mandatory allocation based on gender assumptions". This is a typical logical misalignment, and can even be said to be sophistry!"

She said: "The same price for clothes and shoes of different sizes is essentially a "multi-size adaptation plan for the same product". The core is that the choice is entirely in the hands of consumers - whether men or women, whether they want to wear size S or XXL, it all depends on their own needs. Merchants will not prohibit you from buying large sizes because you are a woman, nor will they force you to buy large sizes because you are a man. The fairness of this rule lies in: the size difference is open to everyone and does not attach any identity labels, but reducing the amount of food according to gender is "I think how much your gender should eat, so I give you that much", which is essentially using gender bias to make decisions for you. "

She said: "The phenomenon of "women eating smaller portions" replaces consumers' independent choices with gender labels - even if a girl has a large appetite and can eat two portions, the merchant will force her to eat less because "you are a girl"; even if a boy has a small appetite and cannot finish one portion, he will be given more because "you are a boy". The "portion difference" here is not based on individual needs, but on gender stereotypes, and the essence is to use prejudice to create double standards. "

She said: "What's even more contradictory is that if we apply the logic of "clothes and shoes are the same price for all sizes" to food, the reasonable approach should be "food is also divided into large and small portions, but the price is the same, and men and women can choose freely" - if you want a small portion, choose a small portion, if you want a large portion, choose a large portion, this is called following the same logic. But now the statement is "determine the portion size by gender", which is equivalent to secretly replacing "autonomous choice" with "gender coercion". To put it bluntly, it wants to use the rationality of "same price" and want to make "gender discrimination" special. It is logically untenable! "

……

Su Xing has been very busy these past two days. After posting the response video, he has not paid attention to the developments on the Internet for the time being.

It wasn't until Thursday night, when she handed in a manuscript for an order, that she looked at Weibo again.

She was a little surprised to see how the situation developed. This incident had already become a trending topic and was ranked very high!

In addition to the slogan "Hold on to your qualities and don't let go", some bloggers also expressed their opinions on this incident.

"Does opening a noodle shop violate the law of heaven?" The video has been deleted and an apology was posted on Weibo.

But his video has already been forwarded and downloaded by many people, and is now circulated everywhere on the Internet.

There were also a lot of insults under his apology Weibo post, and he finally closed the comment section.

There were also some people who went to the door of this noodle restaurant to check in, threw rotten vegetable leaves, rotten eggs, and sprayed paint, and then took photos and videos and posted them online.

Su Xing frowned when he saw what these people were doing.

She is disgusted by the shop's discriminatory treatment of female customers, but she also dislikes those internet parasites who rush to take advantage of any popularity and will do anything for traffic.

She originally intended to hold the store responsible for spreading rumors about her and damaging her reputation.

Looking at the current situation, the shop owner would definitely have a hard time, so she thought it would be better to just forget it. She didn't want to push them into a desperate situation.

Regardless of how sincere his apology on Weibo was, she believed that this incident had taught them a profound lesson. She hoped that they would conduct business with integrity in the future and not treat customers differently based on gender.

---

ps: Everyone, please click [Generate Power for Love]. One account can click three times. Thank you~